Monday, October 29, 2007

Emotional quotient :)




Your EQ is 133



50 or less: Thanks for answering honestly. Now get yourself a shrink, quick!

51-70: When it comes to understanding human emotions, you'd have better luck understanding Chinese.

71-90: You've got more emotional intelligence than the average frat boy. Barely.

91-110: You're average. It's easy to predict how you'll react to things. But anyone could have guessed that.

111-130: You usually have it going on emotionally, but roadblocks tend to land you on your butt.

131-150: You are remarkable when it comes to relating with others. Only the biggest losers get under your skin.

150+: Two possibilities - you've either out "Dr. Phil-ed" Dr. Phil... or you're a dirty liar.

What's Your EQ (Emotional Intelligence Quotient)?
Gave the EQ test - turns out I am remarkable at relating to others :D Or so they say! What do you have to say about this???

9 comments:

AlterinG Abhishek said...

biggest losers get under ur skin!!!!!

nissim said...

relating to others is relative.
some ppl are relatively easy to relate to...most relatives are not.
Food for thought! :~)

Tallur said...

2 options per question - one ethically and morally and emotionally correct, the other absurd on the same grounds. So much for an EQ test.

~S

Tallur said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Tallur said...

And on the same grounds, my EQ turns out to be 173. But people very well know the kind of guy I am! :)

P.S. I am not a dirty liar. :P

Bastet said...

@ Abhishek
Ya, ya, they always do. Easy identification of biggest losers - ppl who get under my skin :D

@ Nissim

Dayaaaaa!

@ Sid

True, one response seems "appropriate" as compared to the other, but, then, if u answer truthfully, each time YOUR response in any given situation need not be the "appropriate" response, na?? For eg, my response to Q7 was (a), though the "right" thing to do would be (b). :P So, have doubts about the 'liar' business :D

Ram said...

I think the point is that this EQ test has options which are either of two extremes and so leaves little room for the middle ground. I have to say that it is poorly designed.

Tallur said...

echo

suma said...

echo.
PS: 153 -how I wish the test was accurate!!